Prolene Mesh Repair of Inguinal Hernias Single Layer Vs Double Layer
Keywords:
Prolene mesh repair, single layer, double layer, inguinal/groin herniaAbstract
Objective: To compare the outcome of single layer Prolene Mesh Repair of inguinal hernias with double layer repair by Prolene Hernia System. Study Design: The was a Quasi experimental study Place and Duration of Study: Department of general surgery , Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences from September 2006 to October 2007 Methodology: In this quasi experimental study a total 60 patients divided into two groups were enrolled, 30 in each group. All male patients diagnosed as having inguinal hernias from 18 – 80 years of age were enrolled. The study was done in six months at the Department of General Surgery, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad. Results: The average post operative pain in Group I was 5.73 and in Group II it was 6.63. The average operative time in Group I was 82.3 and in Group II it was 73.0 minutes. While the average time to return to work was 7.63 in Group I and 10.23 days in Group II. These all the study parameters, the pain score, operative time and return to work were found statistically significant when compared between both study groups (p-value = <0.001). There was less discomfort, less operative time and early return to work seen in the double layer prolene mesh repair when compared with single layer repair. Conclusion: We conclude that in prolene mesh repair with the double layer approach is superior to single layer in terms of post operative pain, return to work and operation tim
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The Journal of Fatima Jinnah Medical University follows the Attribution Creative Commons-Non commercial (CC BY-NC) license which allows the users to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform and build upon the material. The users must give credit to the source and indicate, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. However, the CC By-NC license restricts the use of material for commercial purposes. For further details about the license please check the Creative Commons website. The editorial board of JFJMU strives hard for the authenticity and accuracy of the material published in the journal. However, findings and statements are views of the authors and do not necessarily represent views of the Editorial Board.