Comparison of Functional Shoulder Recovery after Conservative versus Surgical Treatment in Patients with Grade III Acromio-Clavicular Dislocation
Abstract
Objective: To compare the functional shoulder recovery after conservative versus surgical treatment in patients with grade III acromio-clavicular dislocation. Design: It was a randomized controlled trial. Place and Duration of Study: This study was conducted at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Lahore over 2 years period from June 2013 through June 2015. Patients and Methods: 80 patients of both genders aged between 18-65 years presenting with Rockwood Grade-III AC Dislocation were enrolled. These patients were then divided into following two groups randomly using lottery method. Patients in Group-A underwent Conservative Treatment which involved resting of the arm in a broad arm sling for 3 weeks followed by physiotherapy. While patients in Group-B underwent Surgical Treatment which involved open reduction and stabilization of the joint using a hook plate followed by physiotherapy starting at 2 weeks post-operatively. Outcome was was described by using constant score (Appendix-I) in terms of meansd after 6 weeks of treatment. Results: The age of the patients ranged from 18 years to 65 years with a mean of 41.6311.41 years. 37 (46.3%) of the study participants were male while 43 (53.8%) were female. In 45 (56.3%) patients right side was involved while in 35 (43.8%) patients left side was involved. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of mean age (p=0.267), gender (p=0.501) and side involved (p=0.499). When compared the outcome, surgical treatment was better than conservative treatment in terms of mean improvement in pain score (11.683.10 vs. 9.483.13; p=0.0002), mean activities of daily living score (16.803.15 vs. 12.454.10; p=.000), mean movement score (34.984.22 vs. 26.537.01; p=0.000) and mean strength score (21.802.61 vs. 17.954.05; p=0.000). The overall mean constant score was significantly better in Group-B than Group-A (85.256.029 vs. 66.409.58; p=0.000). There was no statistically significant difference when compared the mean constant score among age groups (p=0.824), gender (p=0.727) and side involved (p=0.802) confirming that surgical treatment was better than conservative treatment in all age groups and gender and was not affected by side involved. Conclusion: Surgical treatment is better than conservative treatment in terms of significantly higher mean of constant score in patients with Rockwood Type-III AC dislocation.
The Journal of Fatima Jinnah Medical University follows the Attribution Creative Commons-Non commercial (CC BY-NC) license which allows the users to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform and build upon the material. The users must give credit to the source and indicate, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. However, the CC By-NC license restricts the use of material for commercial purposes. For further details about the license please check the Creative Commons website. The editorial board of JFJMU strives hard for the authenticity and accuracy of the material published in the journal. However, findings and statements are views of the authors and do not necessarily represent views of the Editorial Board.