Comparison of Inguinal Hernia Repair Performed under Local and Spinal Anesthesia as A Day-Case Surgery
Keywords:
Inguinal hernia, Anesthesia, Day-casesAbstract
Objectives: The objective of this study is to compare the frequency of inguinal hernia repair performed under local and spinal anesthesia as a day-case surgery.
Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial
Setting: Surgical Unit-II, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Lahore
Subject and Methods: Hundred patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were selected for study; they were divided into two groups by random number table. In group A hernia repair was done under spinal anesthesia and in group B repair was done under local anesthesia. Spinal anesthesia was given by anesthetist and local anesthesia was given by same team of surgeons. Mesh hernioplasty was performed in all the 100 patients. Patients were discharged when they were pain free {(Visual Analogue Scale (VAS<3)} and passed urine. Total time period from operation till the time of discharge was noted.
Results: In this study rate of day cases in inguinal hernia repair done under local anesthesia was 84 %( 42 /50 patients discharged as day cases), while in spinal anesthesia was 68 %( 34/50 discharged as day cases).
Conclusion: Inguinal hernia repair under local anesthesia is safe and feasible. It has shorter duration of hospital stay, lesser urinary complications and more post-operative analgesia resulting in elective inguinal hernia surgery as a day-case.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The Journal of Fatima Jinnah Medical University follows the Attribution Creative Commons-Non commercial (CC BY-NC) license which allows the users to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform and build upon the material. The users must give credit to the source and indicate, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. However, the CC By-NC license restricts the use of material for commercial purposes. For further details about the license please check the Creative Commons website. The editorial board of JFJMU strives hard for the authenticity and accuracy of the material published in the journal. However, findings and statements are views of the authors and do not necessarily represent views of the Editorial Board.